Why Pakistan Lost the T20 WorldCup Final?
played well in the final but Pakistan lost and if we talk about it that was the same thing but he did not perform in Pakistan in batting. He was able to bat and anyway, his batting was not better than Dilshad or Asif Ali. They were better in the middle. When the dogs and the England team were calling, they used Spain very well and highlighted it. And only later when Shaheen Shah Afridi was selected for the World Twenty20, Shaheen Shah Afridi again became what is on his leg, it seems more like a body taught by a Muslim. After getting one hair done, he went back and after that you also had no luck, but he did it with great difficulty. Everything else is what Iftikhar did. Now even Iftikhar was not fulfilled and the prayer was never forgotten.
What was the use of feeding two orders? They could have put a whole batsman in place, who became full-time, so that 4 players have gone. A partner has also come out, so with the cooler, Pakistan India against England, I think the most blood is not needed in T20, once it should be reduced, the big decision seemed to be merited above Nawaz's place. Another Badminton player could have been brought in who bats properly and creates space for the Pakistan team to make it good. Yes, the start of the Pakistan team was not that good. could not play, except for one player, no one could play so well, even though he batted well, but no one else could live up to the expectations.
They hit hard, they didn't even see the moon in it and why did they tie it, then our Pakistani batsmen followed for seventy meters It is done on, which is taught by both lifters at the same place in two plates, did it happen to him today and also happened to Muhammad Nawaz after that, it is a very strange difference and to understand the batting of Pakistan. Why was batting so confusing and back to one side an if you guys are dyigdying then you should still make 150 andon top of that the vote was like that in the beginning it was getting too tight and then the bowlers in the cup were very strange.
But all of a sudden he was going to do what he wanted to do, so no player was completely written and no batsman was hitting completely, which seemed to be happening, then out after that. If it was done, then Pakistan had a very small population and only 137 people from Pakistan. There is only one benefit to Harris with his short name and within his ring, in the beginning, he is not as good as the rest of the fighters but he has a lot of heavy rain. He spoke very well, he go and t a phone call,,he and also dismissed two players and dismissed very good players, which means after that, Naseem Shah's bowling was one piece too many and he was shooting.
The line of control was not happening, but despite that, speaking We managed to get one player for each India 117 England we have sent home five of their players England and half the team has now done and they also came within 137 so this is a good performance by Pakistan. The performance was if Pakistan could have scored 25 more than Pakistan could have scored, but playing with one minute went by, playing better cricket, more people did not double the budget, then Pakistan easily scored 150 to 160. If Pakistan had scored so much, it would have created more problems for England, or if Shaheen Shah Afridi had scored sixes and Shaheen Shah Afridi was not fit, then England could not have won this match.
Pakistan lost wickets in clusters, ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2022
Pakistan lost six wickets for just 53 runs in the last nine overs of their innings, scoring at an less than six runs per over during that period. Match Highlights: England beat Pakistan to win the ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2022 title.
T20 is cricket, more in it, you have to play cricket with logic, you have to take decisions with logic, there is news, I will share them with you, the first thing is that I told you that That is the news, it will be proved wrong. First of all, the news of violence spread on Arshad Shaheed Bhai's grave was spread by him in order toto spoil it, that is, to make it dirty, to spoil it, to add lies to it.
Later the lie should be exposed and the original case should also be debunked. For example, a user has opened fire and killed one person. Listen and when you don't do the present, the three people were not there. Later, when it is known in another place that they were there, what is done on X and Y will be weakened. I want to explain this to you. What is happening today in the case of Sharif Shaheed Bhai and many more things will be known in the coming time.
There should be an inquiry. It should be asked that behind spreading the news for three hours, there was violence for three hours. Tar Ahmad is an expert doctor of the world. He has discussed the entire Kapura issue. He has said in his tweets that the report of torture on Arshad Sharif on the Pakistani media is false. According to the report, the journalist was shot at close range.
She was not killed and this has been proven by the post-partum report in Pakistan. There is, whiand ound from which the skull and brain are damaged. There is a bullet wound in the chest which entered from the back and from the upper side.
